From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EevqF-0000KU-5v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:43:23 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jANEgf2O020295; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:42:41 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.177]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jANEepQx006219 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:40:51 GMT Received: from [82.83.32.106] (helo=sven.genone.homeip.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu0) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0MKwh2-1Eevnc0Ikc-0005ZJ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:40:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 15:40:49 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Possible solution: email subdomain Message-ID: <20051123154049.6b5af84c@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511211119.17618.pauldv@gentoo.org> <20051123002605.174c3fc8@sven.genone.homeip.net> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_U6mI=PjSCnnJ3/9A6aDYpEg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 X-Archives-Salt: 9a64fbc1-d2ba-4df4-9d75-8e93fc8e2482 X-Archives-Hash: ac340351a82739e06cdb9723da27bae2 --Sig_U6mI=PjSCnnJ3/9A6aDYpEg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:39:08 -0700 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > Here's the proposal again. If there's an issue with it, shoot it > down, but from here, it certainly seems to fit the bill. Again, > I'd /love/ to say I was the one that came up with it, but I wasn't. > =3D8^) >=20 > * give [AH]Ts a .tester@gentoo.org address. >=20 > - It's not a subdomain, so the existing infrastructure should have no > problems with it. >=20 > - testername.tester@gentoo.org remains distinctive enough it should > alleviate any doubts or confusion over status. >=20 > - the biggest possible objection I can see is that the root, > tester@gentoo.org, is already in use. Thus, in particular, I'd like > to see his reaction to this proposal. We could, of course, take the > same idea and change the root, if necessary. My previous suggestion, > intern, would work, or assistant, or something else. Tester is of > course short and concise, but intern or assistant would be more > generic, allowing the possiblity of other non-tester additions, in > the future, with the same root. Has the same problem as a subdomain as it creates two "classes" of devs. So it would solve the potential technical problems, but we still have the semantic issues. Marius --=20 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Sig_U6mI=PjSCnnJ3/9A6aDYpEg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDhH91WzrL1pM7SNcRAloEAJ9nrM+Wvt8aStFHqoq7Hl2/2Sz65gCaAg1m gn31rxvk0gvdMxQzDaJi2VE= =daNw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_U6mI=PjSCnnJ3/9A6aDYpEg-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list