From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EesNK-0007WY-4J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:01:18 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jANB0Y9Y017750; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:00:34 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.197]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jANAwfl2018354 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 10:58:42 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i6so1259662wra for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:58:41 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=B/UWOf/BqL8GMVTK1cBcEKkPmd8Hl6pUjJlH4eTcwSNQNlJ1QiX1GaeuGNLKk0dVF4ckBc1H5dsepothEvFBB2+yfYL92jK8Nq2eFoQdHwIUbbx3HmWstwKrCI8KXp4mrBA8DH35dHSzx2s5XmQRezuZsp7TvWwfVCixDygZtb4= Received: by 10.65.230.13 with SMTP id h13mr5672117qbr; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:58:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.125.78]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e11sm268411qbc.2005.11.23.02.58.40; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:58:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Around 425 non-existent packages in p.mask? Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:58:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9 References: <4383D172.9090902@gentoo.org> <4383F030.6080308@gentoo.org> <20051123105237.GC2257@toucan.gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20051123105237.GC2257@toucan.gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1165143.3k4VMeC2cm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511231158.38348@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 51d6cece-2a74-4a2c-8705-b70097024810 X-Archives-Hash: 02cf08c95c65d4324d4fb00d9e2900ec --nextPart1165143.3k4VMeC2cm Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 23 November 2005 11:52, Mike Frysinger wrote: > yes, i imagine there are a bunch of these false positives ... you can > see the gcc-config mask is wrongly flagged for this reason And the complete KDE mask that is around 300 ebuilds... Really, don't have hurry to "fix" those entries before a true check is done. [as I said on #-dev, there's enough code to parse and check p.mask on my=20 ruby-checker in gentoo-alt overlay... I actually did use it to check=20 senseless masking with 4 lines of extra ruby code a part the already presen= t=20 classes, when I first noticed this problem and referred it on #-dev (before= =20 Doug opened the bug, that is)] =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1165143.3k4VMeC2cm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDhEtee2h1+2mHVWMRAuD0AJ9A/Oz8IqT+clLw/NBls6UB7k/IaACggudE nIbPHHWemZ5oWLhMV2uOVfQ= =QmHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1165143.3k4VMeC2cm-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list