From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EehIF-0005A8-GL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:11:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAMN94ih014911; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:09:04 GMT Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAMN5vTZ017401 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:05:57 GMT Received: from [82.83.32.106] (helo=sven.genone.homeip.net) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1EehD31Z8N-0000y7; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:05:57 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:06:30 +0100 From: Marius Mauch To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Message-ID: <20051123000630.402cf7fa@sven.genone.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <200511181909.59375.cshields@gentoo.org> References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org> <20051119025317.2a8fbddf@snowdrop.home> <200511181909.59375.cshields@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Sig_U22HXD079jIybHyckLDGJql; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:7e6c91d1b14dbccceb2f2166522fa0f6 X-Archives-Salt: 367647f2-35ac-415a-9873-b857917739ac X-Archives-Hash: f9f1be9bc66ef7b055e650c0e381d5f7 --Sig_U22HXD079jIybHyckLDGJql Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:09:57 -0800 Corey Shields wrote: > (apologies for the messed up time in my last message) >=20 > On Friday 18 November 2005 06:53 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > We've seen why this won't work in the past... Too few users know > > how to do proper testing. We've had "please keyword, works for me" > > bugs for things that will always segfault on startup. We've had > > several people who think it'd be clever to automate testing > > reports. We've got enough ricers out there that clearly broken > > things would end up getting "works for me" spammed even more than > > they are already... >=20 > Yeah, it's not a perfect solution, but nothing is. >=20 > I think having users systems would be profiled may help ease the > ricer issue. fex, user A has 3 systems, and marks package B as "!WFM" > on one. devs can cross link that negative mark to the system profile > and note that it's "-O12 --omg-itsofast", and disregard the negative > mark. You could even take it a step further and setup ratings for > the registered users, and those who end up with a set negativity > don't count or something (for the ricers).. >=20 > Not saying this is something that stability or instability should be=20 > automatically assumed from, but that it be used as another tool. > Something to bridge that "poweruser" - "dev" gap. Well, my (non-working and incomplete) stats system could probably provide such functionality if I ever get it working. Marius --=20 Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better. --Sig_U22HXD079jIybHyckLDGJql Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDg6R5WzrL1pM7SNcRAudwAJ9VxENPUTictRxkhU9OOIgNp6RPigCfca2J 5ZFcD9+xX4+wdlIRKIri1FU= =HfkV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_U22HXD079jIybHyckLDGJql-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list