From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeVt7-0003WT-2A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:00:37 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAMAxQ17004807; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:59:26 GMT Received: from callisto.cs.kun.nl (callisto.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.75]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAMAvDxk027610 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:57:13 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by callisto.cs.kun.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6259E2E8216 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:57:47 +0100 (CET) From: Paul de Vrieze To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:57:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> <4381CDE6.5030506@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4381CDE6.5030506@gentoo.org> X-Face: #Lb+'V@sGJ;ptgo5}V"W+5OCoo{LZv;bh,s,`WKLi/J)ed1_$0;6X<=?utf-8?q?700LVV/=3BLqPhiDP=5E=0A=09=27f=5Dfnv?=@%6M8\'HR1t=aFx;ePfp{ZQoBe+e)JOQ8T5*(_;mHY+cltLGq<;@$Y,=?utf-8?q?O=5C=24=0A=09Tm=23G6M?=,g![Q62J{na*S9d;R[^8pc%u\aiLqU@`kJtYl"^6pxdW Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1994865.x9yP3rK22b"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511221157.46966.pauldv@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 42c96bf3-5930-4768-92e5-c6c6a1738bca X-Archives-Hash: 22ac7ac5a24caac383b6bb799c07bf3b --nextPart1994865.x9yP3rK22b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 November 2005 14:38, Alexey Chumakov wrote: > > Hi Curtis, > > First of all, thank you for the impressive new design. I really like > it! > > Technically (@Windows XP SP2 RUS, 1024x768): > Firefox 1.0.7 Rus -- OK > Opera 8.5 Rus -- OK > MSIE 6 Rus -- OK > > Some issues to discuss: > 1. Why is the gentoo logo changed this way? From (my) designer's point > of view, either an infinity sign or Gentoo 'g' is redundant and > unnecessary. This is a feature of the design by Aaron Shi (he designed it). I would=20 however prefer it if the infinity sign was composed of two "o" (oh)=20 characters placed to overlap eachother. Doing that would make the flow of=20 the gentoo word more continuous. Paul =2D-=20 Paul de Vrieze Gentoo Developer Mail: pauldv@gentoo.org Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net --nextPart1994865.x9yP3rK22b Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDgvmqbKx5DBjWFdsRAiGpAKDUaUb1s43OsZidWurVyfWFRkJPvgCeM/f9 oe7tsMBd01Y1HTwBNoTnSXA= =xKU8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1994865.x9yP3rK22b-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list