From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EeM3i-0004pz-Ip for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:30:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAM0U954017600; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:30:09 GMT Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAM0RDKD031493 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 00:27:14 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2607BF85B for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21749-89 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:27:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from washington (washington.osuosl.org [140.211.167.4]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9697BF84B for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:27:12 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] opinion on how to improve the website redesign Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:32:43 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051121140954.GF27085@toucan.gentoo.org> <1132607258.23235.16.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> In-Reply-To: <1132607258.23235.16.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1167497.Vnjxpg9v8N"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511211632.45393.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: d812276e-92d7-4630-afcd-76ab7ff7f9a8 X-Archives-Hash: 0390b3593bbfb151c354ef9c989e308d --nextPart1167497.Vnjxpg9v8N Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 November 2005 01:07 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > I thought that Daniel was taking the red bubble letters. I also > remember the discussion about the infinity logo way back then and the > decision was made to keep it. For one, it is very easy to print, I thought that the vote was for a website redesign, not a logo redesign. I= =20 agree that the infinity sign should go. No other "Gentoo" text on that pag= e=20 has the sign, so it looks out of place and inconsistent to have it in one=20 spot. =2DC =2D-=20 Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields --nextPart1167497.Vnjxpg9v8N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDgmctpq/4o6MEFFMRAmCuAJ9J8Dqq2UC2ezn6KHlpiTobf7UgkwCfb7hM Q9bUj8dYyD8ZXldvmOlmag8= =dXJj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1167497.Vnjxpg9v8N-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list