From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ee7l3-0001Fa-R7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:14:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAL9DUWL032671; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:13:30 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAL99tvY009106 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:09:55 GMT Received: from 83.72.33.139.ip.tele2adsl.dk ([83.72.33.139] helo=dmz.brixandersen.dk) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee7gR-0004co-80 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:09:55 +0000 Received: by dmz.brixandersen.dk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D1D4327FCA; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:09:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 10:09:53 +0100 From: Henrik Brix Andersen To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Distcc and SLP - request for testing Message-ID: <20051121090953.GB25835@dmz.brixandersen.dk> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <1132507911.17028.27.camel@localhost> <4380D0A0.1090302@gentoo.org> <1132516791.17028.29.camel@localhost> <4380FC95.4030003@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4380FC95.4030003@gentoo.org> X-PGP-Key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~brix/files/HenrikBrixAndersen.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 160d0834-6eaf-453b-bf0b-ac696d4cae2c X-Archives-Hash: 73efbb6542e0ae6b53d5d06deb3fc1b3 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 02:45:41PM -0800, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > Our policy for X is that if upstream won't accept it, we won't either. > Perhaps you'd be interested in adopting that and convincing the reported > to get upstream interested? The mobile herd has the same policy. Of course, simple build related bugs can be fixed without having the patch accepted by upstream first, but stuff like new feature should be pushed upstream (and accepted) before being accepted in the ebuilds maintained by the mobile herd. Regards, Brix --=20 Henrik Brix Andersen Gentoo Metadistribution | Mobile computing herd --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: GnuPG signed iD8DBQFDgY7hv+Q4flTiePgRAmeGAKCowIbdq6MAA03ZuzL1x1TJBv5CNgCcC+96 88yuYGkJYbkFVAUCfRnXhog= =Mrqr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list