From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ee6Un-0005vb-E7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:53:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAL7r1tm031546; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:53:01 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAL7p6WQ003193 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:51:07 GMT Received: from cp237988-a.mill1.nb.home.nl ([84.29.235.69] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Ee6SA-0004tm-8s for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:51:06 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:51:35 +0100 From: Harald van =?utf-8?Q?D=C4=B3k?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] status of http://wwwredesign.gentoo.org Message-ID: <20051121075135.GA6054@gentoo.org> References: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <438174BD.9060100@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: ef0f4173-c523-47c3-8793-4d388037780c X-Archives-Hash: f8b63c923b02b799139209d5ef6f50c3 --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 02:18:21AM -0500, Curtis Napier wrote: > If you have access to a Macintosh, Windows, *BSD or any other OS or=20 > Browser please test the site and include your OS and the browser version= =20 > in your feedback. I haven't received feedback from Konqueror or Safari=20 > so feedback from those browsers would be much appreciated. It looks good in w3m, except for one minor thing: since background images don't show, the top left link (a transparent image to show the background) is simply a large empty block. Could you use a real image for that, assuming that doesn't break anything in other browsers? --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDgXyHwnQyISwouHwRArF2AJ0YY/ftpLr3QVeHCnzld6HuIp8N3ACfbvXp 9i/kzCdBBRBnKKacGi1SMNI= =PqHg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list