From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edi2j-0000wx-2c for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:47:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAK5kUBJ008167; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:46:30 GMT Received: from tirpitz.iat.sfu.ca (tirpitz.iat.sfu.ca [209.87.56.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAK5igt1021899 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:44:43 GMT Received: (qmail 17556 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2005 21:44:42 -0800 Received: from s01060050da688d47.vc.shawcable.net (HELO orbis-terrarum.net) (24.80.100.253) by tirpitz.iat.sfu.ca with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Nov 2005 21:44:42 -0800 Received: (qmail 18331 invoked by uid 10000); 19 Nov 2005 21:44:41 -0800 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:44:41 -0800 From: "Robin H. Johnson" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 Message-ID: <20051120054441.GA17389@curie-int.vc.shawcable.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <200511192042.38836.cshields@gentoo.org> <438000AD.404@gentoo.org> <200511192104.13982.cshields@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200511192104.13982.cshields@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 7de20034-fb13-48e7-93a3-7351dd24954b X-Archives-Hash: fdc40231e7b2183b59ed1a9d8453a803 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 09:04:13PM -0800, Corey Shields wrote: > On Saturday 19 November 2005 08:50 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > > Yeah, we defiantly could use a beefy new server for CVS/SVN. Just make > > sure you chat with robbat2/Pylon on the specifics for the requirements. > > I believe the main thing they wanted was lots of ram. > As discussed before, the new dev will be a dual xeon 3.0/1M, 2GB ram, 6x1= 46GB=20 > U320 scsi. adding more ram to this setup wouldn't be a problem. I'll cc= =20 > them and ask how much ram hits the sweet spot and get a new quote this we= ek. 4Gb of RAM would enable the current CVS speedups to continue, and also allow for keeping all of the CVS/SVN trees (2Gb of data presently) in the memory-cached files (important for speed). The Xeon's need to be be HT-capable (the present ones are), as that helps spread available CPU around the tasks that do use it better. The 6x146GB is overkill for storage, unless you have some other plans that I'm not aware of (I'm assuming RAID5 with a hot-spare, so 4x146GB usable). 6x72GB might be more suitable for the budget. --=20 Robin Hugh Johnson E-Mail : robbat2@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Robbat2 @ Orbis-Terrarum Networks iD8DBQFDgA1JPpIsIjIzwiwRAvpUAJ44GRVtnqeu9wMH4LafI5V8ILCQvgCg+tkL ePLdHy8QUgeCXEay+HZiyQg= =c/1I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list