From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edd52-00019s-Ty for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:29:17 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAK0STBj002184; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:28:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAK0Qi8t023148 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:26:44 GMT Received: from cpe-65-26-255-237.wi.res.rr.com ([65.26.255.237] helo=nightcrawler) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Edd2V-0008Mu-Be; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:26:39 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:26:28 -0600 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: forum-mods@gentoo.org, kloeri@gentoo.org Subject: Retiring devs [was Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41] Message-ID: <20051120002627.GH4535@nightcrawler> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119190355.GB28867@gentoo.org> <20051119191403.GZ12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119195115.GA4535@nightcrawler> <20051119220358.GB12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119223052.GC4535@nightcrawler> <20051119224737.GD12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119225207.GE4535@nightcrawler> <20051119230444.GF12982@mail.lieber.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/Gk0KcsbyUMelFU1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051119230444.GF12982@mail.lieber.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: fbe7ac15-4235-4cc4-9421-e96a8bdbe698 X-Archives-Hash: 095ade6a621fda295a4f1d478c43f824 --/Gk0KcsbyUMelFU1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 11:04:44PM +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by=20 > > either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts=20 > > themselves (rather then asking infra to do so) >=20 > First I've heard of this request. Has a bug been submitted for it? It's > easy enough to set up some cron jobs to run scripts and email output to an > alias or mailing list. =20 Only the usual irc infra requests (will take that comment as=20 indication it's time to open a bug). Would need the ability to maintain a blacklist of users to=20 auto-ignore (releng), and would need to pull from svn also (something=20 the current script doesn't handle afaik). Binding pulling buzilla stats in would be needed also (poke kloeri=20 about that one). Ultimately, tracking actual pulls (ssh access on lark) rather then=20 just pushes would be needed to- otherwise new doc devs, AT's, and new=20 alt devs would be flagged due to their lack of the write bit. Forums people, any thoughts/requirements? ~harring --/Gk0KcsbyUMelFU1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDf8KzvdBxRoA3VU0RAhQ5AJsEw6MVBuEXIRsobXhuGR9MV+N7XQCfSa2R QFHLOyLC6Ua98jmTdMDsjgs= =O4g+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/Gk0KcsbyUMelFU1-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list