From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edbkz-0006M0-FL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:04:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJN3PCf022448; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:03:25 GMT Received: from jaguar.lieber.org (jaguar.lieber.org [217.160.252.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJN0FWK025424 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:00:16 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C199129D745 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jaguar.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 07167-08 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:04:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E905129D743; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:04:44 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 Message-ID: <20051119230444.GF12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119190355.GB28867@gentoo.org> <20051119191403.GZ12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119195115.GA4535@nightcrawler> <20051119220358.GB12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119223052.GC4535@nightcrawler> <20051119224737.GD12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119225207.GE4535@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051119225207.GE4535@nightcrawler> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3, AWL=0.005, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -5.894 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 860d5ee7-f262-4d40-ba01-ad632b65554e X-Archives-Hash: e2a7fca8afe6021be90e5bd669a08541 --1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 04:52:08PM -0600 or thereabouts, Brian Harring wrot= e: > Devrel doesn't have much issues in actually retiring a dev from where=20 > I'm sitting. Then I guess we'll disagree on this. > The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by=20 > either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts=20 > themselves (rather then asking infra to do so) First I've heard of this request. Has a bug been submitted for it? It's easy enough to set up some cron jobs to run scripts and email output to an alias or mailing list. =20 --kurt --1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDf6+MJPpRNiftIEYRAiT+AJ4uWfh94WDsuP8w0LbY7PS0l8cygQCeNy8g 7KvvD6z7JFg/R1KfZUPG+O0= =Gu9k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1J4USyVh4Jt5OGCL-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list