From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edbe5-0003XW-3F for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:57:21 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJMuDjI008428; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:56:13 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJMqPLV029932 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:52:26 GMT Received: from cpe-65-26-255-237.wi.res.rr.com ([65.26.255.237] helo=nightcrawler) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EdbZJ-0001zV-2I for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:52:25 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:52:08 -0600 From: Brian Harring To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 Message-ID: <20051119225207.GE4535@nightcrawler> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119190355.GB28867@gentoo.org> <20051119191403.GZ12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119195115.GA4535@nightcrawler> <20051119220358.GB12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119223052.GC4535@nightcrawler> <20051119224737.GD12982@mail.lieber.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051119224737.GD12982@mail.lieber.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: db20983d-683a-4820-aa6b-6449fdc1c56c X-Archives-Hash: 4ac07b62d4d7450bb81b822901d5898a --ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 10:47:37PM +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 04:30:53PM -0600 or thereabouts, Brian Harring wr= ote: > > Infra doesn't even do retirement beyond when _devrel_ asks them to. If > > that process is slow, ask for help and someone will chip in and improve > > it (mainly to minimize bottleneck involved). >=20 > OK, fine. Devrel does not have an established track record of retiring > devs who are otherwise inactive. Please fix this. Please also get an > agreement from them that they're going to be willing to take on the > additional load of these arch testers. Then please articulate the process > that will be followed to ensure they're actively tracked and retired > if/when they fall off the map. Devrel doesn't have much issues in actually retiring a dev from where=20 I'm sitting. The problem is in detection- an infra issue that could be solved by=20 either allowing normal devrel people to run the detection scripts=20 themselves (rather then asking infra to do so), or in modifying the=20 commit hooks so it pushes info into ldap (which we can access). Again... setup cost (something I'm more then willing to implement). ~harring --ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDf6yXvdBxRoA3VU0RAnPcAJkBuTZe41swI6X/q49xauUY8NRHEACfbqDP SXm5uJJ95FXUbYJjo5nL3ds= =aS5m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZInfyf7laFu/Kiw7-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list