From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdbWK-0007li-4p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:49:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJMkLPF019074; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:46:21 GMT Received: from jaguar.lieber.org (jaguar.lieber.org [217.160.252.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJMh9uZ027710 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:43:09 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306A729C1F3 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:47:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jaguar.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 06967-01 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F104829C101; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:47:37 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 Message-ID: <20051119224737.GD12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119190355.GB28867@gentoo.org> <20051119191403.GZ12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119195115.GA4535@nightcrawler> <20051119220358.GB12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119223052.GC4535@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZXzThk3vFZecBD04" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051119223052.GC4535@nightcrawler> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.893 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3, AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -5.893 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: f466ed0a-c5a3-40c0-a4fb-3a35374ce786 X-Archives-Hash: 171e4976fd96df85fc2863b99ee95b34 --ZXzThk3vFZecBD04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 04:30:53PM -0600 or thereabouts, Brian Harring wrote: > Infra doesn't even do retirement beyond when _devrel_ asks them to. If > that process is slow, ask for help and someone will chip in and improve > it (mainly to minimize bottleneck involved). OK, fine. Devrel does not have an established track record of retiring devs who are otherwise inactive. Please fix this. Please also get an agreement from them that they're going to be willing to take on the additional load of these arch testers. Then please articulate the process that will be followed to ensure they're actively tracked and retired if/when they fall off the map. Thanks. --kurt --ZXzThk3vFZecBD04 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDf6uJJPpRNiftIEYRAn8hAKCTJW4lwHIJq/k6Jos3XRDsfMiGzQCfULOT sRKgi2ZBYz7xouSP2zcvW0M= =L7+7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZXzThk3vFZecBD04-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list