From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdhPo-0005l0-NE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:07:01 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAK56Heo005392; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:06:17 GMT Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAK54PPL013939 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 05:04:26 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E009BE479; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:04:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31756-08; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:04:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4339FBE46A; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:04:25 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, robbat2@gentoo.org, pylon@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:04:13 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <200511192042.38836.cshields@gentoo.org> <438000AD.404@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <438000AD.404@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511192104.13982.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: f500d5d6-a734-4f86-b693-d4ed57d08bc2 X-Archives-Hash: e56c3c2dcc491be33bf52971c10d72bd On Saturday 19 November 2005 08:50 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > Yeah, we defiantly could use a beefy new server for CVS/SVN. Just make > sure you chat with robbat2/Pylon on the specifics for the requirements. > I believe the main thing they wanted was lots of ram. As discussed before, the new dev will be a dual xeon 3.0/1M, 2GB ram, 6x146GB U320 scsi. adding more ram to this setup wouldn't be a problem. I'll cc them and ask how much ram hits the sweet spot and get a new quote this week. -C -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list