From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdYA3-0002ZB-Md for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:14:08 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJJClRk017961; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:12:47 GMT Received: from jaguar.lieber.org (jaguar.lieber.org [217.160.252.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJJ9ZAe012129 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:09:36 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C2A29C1F3 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:14:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jaguar.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30562-10 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 17F3729C101; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 19:14:03 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] implementation details for GLEP 41 Message-ID: <20051119191403.GZ12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <20051119170615.GW12982@mail.lieber.org> <20051119190355.GB28867@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="63aIh6YiuHX+oBFP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051119190355.GB28867@gentoo.org> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3, AWL=0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -5.892 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 3a5f564f-1013-4398-b3fb-17c3923406f0 X-Archives-Hash: 79322f188f5bfaf9e4793571da9ee902 --63aIh6YiuHX+oBFP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 08:03:55PM +0100 or thereabouts, Sven Vermeulen wro= te: > On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:06:15PM +0000, Kurt Lieber wrote: > > Now, the same question for email -- how do we manage aliases, especially > > for inactive, retired and semi-retired arch testers? We could track us= age > > in logs, but between mailing list subscriptions, bugzilla notifications= and > > all sorts of other automated emails, that's not an accurate representat= ion > > of whether an email alias is actively used or not. >=20 > Isn't this an issue that also exists for the Gentoo developers in general? Not as much since we can track things like last cvs commit, last login to toucan, etc. But it does exist to some extent. That does not, however, make it acceptable to further exacerbate the problem. We're working towards improving the procedures and controls we have in place today. We're not going to implement something that will move us backwards. --kurt --63aIh6YiuHX+oBFP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDf3l7JPpRNiftIEYRAohtAJoDWf0hZklJhnRCaaEEGw9QfPVRlgCeODJ6 5/pOQsmPxz3z/juDR0of9Fc= =Eh+g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --63aIh6YiuHX+oBFP-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list