From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdXJN-0000v1-3z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:19:41 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJIIvDL029904; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:18:57 GMT Received: from jaguar.lieber.org (jaguar.lieber.org [217.160.252.168]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJIG7dV007577 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:16:08 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F011929C1F3 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.lieber.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (jaguar.lieber.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28352-19 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by jaguar.lieber.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2E24629C101; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:20:36 +0000 From: Kurt Lieber To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for changes to GLEP 41 Message-ID: <20051119182036.GY12982@mail.lieber.org> References: <20051119162620.GU12982@mail.lieber.org> <437F69C5.1000100@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <437F69C5.1000100@gentoo.org> X-GPG-Key: http://www.lieber.org/kurtl.pub.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lieber.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.892 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-3.3, AWL=0.007, BAYES_00=-2.599] X-Spam-Score: -5.892 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 1c6cf80d-111f-4db4-a313-7d7bc1896d2a X-Archives-Hash: 59c2c80fea671367b7929ae26b973c5e --ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 07:07:01PM +0100 or thereabouts, Simon Stelling wrote: > However, the council asked for it, and so it was changed. And the council > didn't ask for this on his own, they were just reflecting the majority of > devs, so we'll have to accept that. If there's one thing I've learned in my tenure with this project is that there is no such thing as a majority of devs. We never have the majority agree on *anything*. So, I don't think that statement is accurate. Not trying to be pedantic, but the notion that the majority of Gentoo support(s|ed) GLEP 41 is one that I believe to be incorrect. --kurt --ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDf2z0JPpRNiftIEYRAgsmAJ9FM2eiDEYtn2qp3/36BIFR7ul72ACdH49w O4lDIN7nXN1WwKJCs9SopVY= =kKZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftQmbtOmUf2cr8rB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list