From: Kurt Lieber <klieber@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Request for changes to GLEP 41
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:26:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051119162620.GU12982@mail.lieber.org> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1790 bytes --]
OK, enough has been said about the current problems that some people
have with GLEP 41. I'm not going to belabor that. Instead, I'm going to
ask for one of three changes. What I object to most strongly is the notion
that we're classifying devs based on their relative worth to the project
and assigning them email addresses accordingly. Some folks will remember
far back enough to when we had developers, senior developers, etc. and the
problems that that caused. I don't want to see the same thing happen here.
So, could we please make one of the following three changes to GLEP 41:
* Drop the idea of giving the arch testers an email alias altogether
I don't see what benefit this provides, to be honest. It's not much of a
spiff and if someone is signing up to help with testing just for the
email address, they're not here for the right reasons anyway.
* Change @subdomain.gentoo.org to @gentoo.org.
If we want to give them a spiff in recognition of their contribution to
the project, give them the real thing. We do this today for any number
of other non-developer groups, including GWN translators, documentation
translators, etc.
* Create an entirely new domain
This is my least favorite option, but one that I offer as a way to try
and compromise on all of this. I still think this segregates people, but
in a much less discriminatory fashion. Additionally, with a new domain,
we could open it up to a much broader audience. (offering email
addresses to folks who donate in other ways -- financially, hardware,
bandwidth, etc.) This may seem largely like a matter of semantics and I
guess it is. However, this whole disagreement is largely about
perception anyway and a separate domain just seems less disagreeable to
me.
--kurt
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-19 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-19 16:26 Kurt Lieber [this message]
2005-11-19 18:07 ` [gentoo-dev] Request for changes to GLEP 41 Simon Stelling
2005-11-19 18:20 ` Kurt Lieber
2005-11-19 18:39 ` Simon Stelling
2005-11-19 18:50 ` Lance Albertson
2005-11-20 1:07 ` Jeroen Roovers
2005-11-20 13:04 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-11-20 11:10 ` [gentoo-dev] " Mike Frysinger
2005-11-20 11:58 ` Re[2]: " Jakub Moc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051119162620.GU12982@mail.lieber.org \
--to=klieber@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox