From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Edbus-0007mW-IY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:14:42 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJNCaBd017757; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:12:36 GMT Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJN813j003947 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:08:02 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82557BF85D for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:08:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03328-69 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:08:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493F3BF83B for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:08:01 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:07:53 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <1132439272.13917.58.camel@thor.tres.org> <20051119224046.GD4535@nightcrawler> In-Reply-To: <20051119224046.GD4535@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511191507.53364.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 617f7b1a-b1b2-4c96-8230-9b516f871701 X-Archives-Hash: e41de74baa897e2402c4cd36816359f0 On Saturday 19 November 2005 02:40 pm, Brian Harring wrote: > Easier, and saner to just plain drop the subdomain notion. Avoids the > whole gentoo personel first class/second class issue first of all, > second avoids infra aliasing annoyances. I agree with this. -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list