From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdbsB-00061K-FM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:11:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJN9grg006486; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:09:42 GMT Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJN6qcv013929 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 23:06:52 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8315DBF83B for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11063-24 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:06:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A088BF835 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:06:51 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 15:06:41 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <437F9739.4060501@gentoo.org> <20051119221941.GB4535@nightcrawler> In-Reply-To: <20051119221941.GB4535@nightcrawler> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511191506.41732.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 6ac9eec1-d95d-4ea5-8382-9c4bd28db39f X-Archives-Hash: 563128af978174de0c16e38b37c2e0de On Saturday 19 November 2005 02:19 pm, Brian Harring wrote: > > Minor? What you're asking for will cause a lot of administrative > > nightmare for infra to manage those subdomain addresses among other > > things. > > Frankly I think you're exagerating here. What about the end-user headache of having to change subscriptions/bugzilla accounts/aliases/etc. from username@subdomain.gentoo.org to username@gentoo.org should they turn dev? > It's a crazy notion, but y'all could've commented in the *TWO* months > that this glep has been percolating, "yo, what do you want from an > infra standpoint?". Yeah, my bad.. Had I known that infrastructure implementation decisions could be decided by a GLEP with no infra input requested, I would have paid attention. Besides, when I first read the glep "*TWO* months ago" there was nothing about email subdomains.. It was fine.. Therefore, I did not comment. > That's why you're on this ml- that is why gleps get sent to this ml- so > that all of the various groups can weigh in. Yup. And as soon as it caught my eye I weighed in.. and you're not happy with it. -shrug- Next GLEP will be how to use constructive SUBJECT lines for people who have too much email to keep up with so stuff like this will be caught sooner. > I see this mainly as infra/trustees not watching the ML. Foundation has nothing to do with this issue whatsoever. > Sucks, but too damn bad. So will be finding help from infra to implement this with that attitude. You're not helping the situation, Brian.. Kurt and Lance have spent the past few hours talking about implementing this while you blast them on the list. > I'm going to keep my mouth shut on the backdoor comment, aside from > stating that's behaviour I hope to _never_ see out of a trustee again. > ~harring Okay, you have already pinged me on IRC about this since my original correction was not good enough for you. I corrected my wrong in this thread, but I still feel that the lack of delay between the changes and the vote was not enough for devs to comment (specifically Lance). I don't care if I am a trustee or not, that's wrong. After your last email, I don't think you are in any position to comment on behaviour. ;) -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list