From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdbH1-0005BI-6s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:33:31 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJMWDqc000718; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:32:13 GMT Received: from ns1.osuosl.org (ns1.osuosl.org [140.211.166.130]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJMTbEu021862 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:29:37 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3F6BEA16 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01407-64 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:29:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C064ABE9FC for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:29:36 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 14:29:27 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051119194848.GC28867@gentoo.org> <437FA4C3.6060208@linuxfreak.ca> In-Reply-To: <437FA4C3.6060208@linuxfreak.ca> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511191429.27503.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests= X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 63ce21b0-4ef0-4eec-9006-a0b3acf55557 X-Archives-Hash: 8ee757f811dc7d45b21efa450bad281a On Saturday 19 November 2005 02:18 pm, Patrick McLean wrote: > This thread has had a disturbing amount of bickering, and there appears > to be a bit of a sentiment that arch testers don't contribute anything > more than a normal user. I have filed and commented on more bugs in the > week since I became an arch tester than I had total in the 3 years I > have been using Gentoo before that. Please don't get the wrong impression.. The bickering is not about whether ATs get to have their own repo/service to sync from, nor about whether they deserve email accounts, it is about implementation of those, and how the council is handling it. Personally, I am fine with the idea of a repo and fine with the email accounts. -C -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list