From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EdPKt-0008R8-Gc
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:48:43 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ9m2Vj000088;
	Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:48:02 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ9kEfc007604
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:15 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EdPIU-00077e-Du
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:14 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54)
	id 1EdPIR-0004jx-H6
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:11 +0000
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:08 +0000
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain
Message-ID: <20051119094608.0275f015@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <437EF0EB.3030109@gentoo.org>
References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost>
	<20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org>
	<1044169158.20051119031533@gentoo.org>
	<200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org>
	<437EF0EB.3030109@gentoo.org>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 466532ed-4424-48cd-bc8a-a6efb6f703dc
X-Archives-Hash: 58c273246ecd4377aa65ed94dfde852a

--Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:31:23 +0100 Thierry Carrez <koon@gentoo.org>
wrote:
| You can't just ignore the discussion and the iterim decisions and
| complain afterwards when the decision is taken.

What discussion? As both myself and Grant pointed out on this list
before the meeting, there wasn't any. Yet the council decided to go
ahead and approve the thing anyway...

A large part of the GLEP process is discussion and review. The council
has chosen to have this part skipped. Sure, you're saying it won't
happen in the future, but it has happened for this GLEP and as a result
there's lots of mess. What did you expect would happen when you cut out
a core part of the process?

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDfvRj96zL6DUtXhERAm3wAKCx3yQhbzuYyE1M6sHh5jnrvFPvPwCfXf5S
kXE5ow55kdhy/3yDBWBz4mc=
=y5V0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list