From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdPKt-0008R8-Gc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:48:43 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ9m2Vj000088; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:48:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ9kEfc007604 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:15 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EdPIU-00077e-Du for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:14 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EdPIR-0004jx-H6 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:11 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:46:08 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Message-ID: <20051119094608.0275f015@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <437EF0EB.3030109@gentoo.org> References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1044169158.20051119031533@gentoo.org> <200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org> <437EF0EB.3030109@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 466532ed-4424-48cd-bc8a-a6efb6f703dc X-Archives-Hash: 58c273246ecd4377aa65ed94dfde852a --Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 10:31:23 +0100 Thierry Carrez <koon@gentoo.org> wrote: | You can't just ignore the discussion and the iterim decisions and | complain afterwards when the decision is taken. What discussion? As both myself and Grant pointed out on this list before the meeting, there wasn't any. Yet the council decided to go ahead and approve the thing anyway... A large part of the GLEP process is discussion and review. The council has chosen to have this part skipped. Sure, you're saying it won't happen in the future, but it has happened for this GLEP and as a result there's lots of mess. What did you expect would happen when you cut out a core part of the process? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDfvRj96zL6DUtXhERAm3wAKCx3yQhbzuYyE1M6sHh5jnrvFPvPwCfXf5S kXE5ow55kdhy/3yDBWBz4mc= =y5V0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_GoXTUx/5GxSwdxv+.Twio80-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list