From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdItL-0005U7-3E for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:55:51 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ2t8Ed000537; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:55:08 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ2rMeU006999 for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:53:23 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EdIqw-00052V-2B for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:53:22 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EdIqt-0001ZB-SY for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:53:19 +0000 Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 02:53:17 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Message-ID: <20051119025317.2a8fbddf@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org> References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <20051119003803.GD12958@dst.grantgoodyear.org> <1044169158.20051119031533@gentoo.org> <200511191334.10158.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_n/1NI.TUXFF8gxoIeyprfbc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4e2e6621-9914-4f63-be28-6521c5f178c8 X-Archives-Hash: 25cebf1db105fbb4c5c04abc1f5df7a4 --Sig_n/1NI.TUXFF8gxoIeyprfbc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:34:10 -0800 Corey Shields <cshields@gentoo.org> wrote: | Why not ditch the idea of yellow-starred "arch testers" and make it | easy for *all* users to participate in the stability-validation of | all of our packages? We've seen why this won't work in the past... Too few users know how to do proper testing. We've had "please keyword, works for me" bugs for things that will always segfault on startup. We've had several people who think it'd be clever to automate testing reports. We've got enough ricers out there that clearly broken things would end up getting "works for me" spammed even more than they are already... --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Look! Shiny things!) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Sig_n/1NI.TUXFF8gxoIeyprfbc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDfpOf96zL6DUtXhERAvDSAJ9LV04xxmE0A5OlirWEFhB1MaLmfACbBTvW nLIHqVcrD38EKI9/0Yl402k= =hSo/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_n/1NI.TUXFF8gxoIeyprfbc-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list