From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ed8YW-0004N8-Fm for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:53:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAIFqxOJ005211; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:52:59 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAIFpDWs027968 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:51:14 GMT Received: from zb159056.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([219.125.159.56] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1Ed8W9-0002Qr-KE for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:51:13 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAD2C24916D; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:53:03 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] FEATURES=test and the internet Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:53:03 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <46059ce10511161838k11292fc9q428fb3db351dfafb@mail.gmail.com> <200511182059.27723.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <437DD523.5040806@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <437DD523.5040806@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511190053.03748.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: f123caf6-fbee-47ab-96ef-532a7b47fa7a X-Archives-Hash: bdb1eec9dfc341e331d79b23f35096b7 On Friday 18 November 2005 22:20, Michael Cummings wrote: > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > There are several requests on the bug, the majority are now fixed and > > > > everybody (at least within the portage team) is agreed that FEATURES > > should not be added to USE_EXPAND. Essentially, I didn't take the time > > to read through all the follow-ups related (and unrelated) to the one > > request that wasn't addressed. A comment didn't seem to be required as > > it appeared to be one of those bugs that are left open for months after > > being fixed. Reopen and adjust the summary to something relevant if > > you like. > > There's a reason that bugzilla mandates you provide a comment before > closing a bug - even if its to say what you just did. "Resolved - Fixed"? > While the bug may have devolved, the original gist still stands - can we > have a means of having FEATURES="maktest" translated into a use flag > without requiring users to set both? (see my last comment in the bug for > my interest on the matter :) I'm not advocating a full FEATURE explosion > or anything of the like, and maybe this is something that should have > been a USE flag and not a FEATURE to begin with, but its where we're at. The last discussion that was had ended up with a TDEPEND, but that doesn't cover the additional SRC_URI requirements. Besides SRC_URI, are there any other requirements that might sneak in later on? > I can of course take this over to bugzilla if you'd prefer :) Nah, let's get it in the open (again) and get it dealt with. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list