From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdKb1-00072M-Q0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:45:04 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ4iJfI019849; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:44:19 GMT Received: from ns2.osuosl.org (ns2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ4gZf4005751 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:42:35 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5DA121BE7 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:42:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04481-35 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69E8121B9E for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:42:33 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:42:30 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511182022.00662.cshields@gentoo.org> <437EAABE.5050502@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <437EAABE.5050502@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511182042.30961.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: 591b63c9-477d-4e95-a7cb-39196c965e7e X-Archives-Hash: 4553ee71ee8e077af2db5588ff2d2120 On Friday 18 November 2005 08:31 pm, Lance Albertson wrote: > No, thats not entirely true. It was submitted a few months ago and taken > to the council where it was rejected and asked to be revised. When the > council asked for things to put on their agenda for this latest meeting, > it was asked that this GLEP be voted upon again. At this point, the > revised version had yet to be shown on -dev for discussion. It wasn't > until a day before the vote that it was sent to -dev for discussion. > > I just wanted to get the facts straight :-) (at least from how I know). Ahh, ok thanks for clearing that up. Still screwed up. Lesson learned, make friends with a majority of the council, write and propose a glep the day before a meeting and then push it through. wow. sounds a lot like American politics. -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list