From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdKDi-00039W-F3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:20:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ4KFjc026103; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:20:15 GMT Received: from ns2.osuosl.org (ns2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ4IRoA015365 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 04:18:27 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F30121BD6 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00445-44 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:18:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522A9121A68 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:18:26 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:18:24 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511181945.57660.cshields@gentoo.org> <36babadf0511182002p2f7f3b3mcdd0936deed5b729@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <36babadf0511182002p2f7f3b3mcdd0936deed5b729@mail.gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200511182018.24457.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: dea00b36-3685-492a-99b1-eef1ca5a2b5e X-Archives-Hash: 0ab7d901f5e5cc71e370d070f119957a On Friday 18 November 2005 08:02 pm, George Prowse wrote: > Of course, by being restrictive to the people who wish to help long-term > that is the greatest benefit to gentoo. If the @g.o email addresses are a > problem then the subdomain @staff.g.o has been suggested. The staff > subdomain would contain almost all relevant other domains. If in the > unlikely event that somone proposes a subdomain to gentoo that couldn't be > considered 'staff' or 'developer' then that can be considered at a later > date. I would consider such a silly proposal as the staff.gentoo.org subdomain addresses as "unlikely", so I'm just trying to think ahead.. > In the mean time we can have a GLEP about that site you were suggesting > because that would make the ATs more efficient. Such a site is not a GLEP-worthy thing.. it does not directly affect the distribution. But that is neither here nor there. It is nothing I'm not working on anytime soon.. -C -- Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list