From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EdJY6-0008Sp-2w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:37:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jAJ3bGFd032549; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:37:16 GMT Received: from ns2.osuosl.org (ns2.osuosl.org [140.211.166.131]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAJ3ZUMM000665 for ; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 03:35:31 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AB712194D for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:35:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ns1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02236-17 for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:35:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-67-168-254-71.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.254.71]) (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ns2.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2BC11218ED for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:35:29 -0800 (PST) From: Corey Shields To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Email subdomain Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 19:35:25 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <1132333748.8524.9.camel@localhost> <200511181909.59375.cshields@gentoo.org> <20051119032327.29137969@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051119032327.29137969@snowdrop.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1198231.YxPcbmnNm3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511181935.27344.cshields@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at osuosl.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 tagged_above=-999.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL, BAYES_00 X-Spam-Level: X-Archives-Salt: d7f215e1-3469-46f8-bf5f-36bd8c31183b X-Archives-Hash: 8d61794be3f473f2dbd086f6c4ede44b --nextPart1198231.YxPcbmnNm3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-6" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 18 November 2005 07:23 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > See, it's a question of quality rather than numbers. One "it works" > report from someone who knows what they're doing is worth far more than > a thousand "it works" reports from random users. Expecting a large > number of average Joe types to produce useful testing reports is like > expecting a large number of average Joe types to produce a Wikipedia > article on how quantum cryptography works or a large number of average > Joe types to produce a Gentoo Wiki article on the design and internal > workings of versionator.eclass. =46air enough > There was a similar proposal from (?)rac a couple of years back. Might > be worth looking at why arch teams hated it last time around. will do =2D-=20 Corey Shields Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Team Gentoo Foundation Board of Trustees http://www.gentoo.org/~cshields --nextPart1198231.YxPcbmnNm3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDfp1/pq/4o6MEFFMRAjS4AKCoqU/RQ6H3c3b9oBRueLmQhLH6BQCfSWTN V5yQbLmafTbnIs+uEvel7Zs= =NHom -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1198231.YxPcbmnNm3-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list