From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EZDdv-0004cQ-4y for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:31:03 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA7KT1vc013375; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:29:01 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA7KMDOS015654 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:22:13 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EZDVM-0005AD-8r for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:22:12 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EZDV8-0003SB-HJ for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:21:58 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 20:21:55 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two Message-ID: <20051107202155.08f2a835@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <436FB4BB.3020205@gentoo.org> References: <20051105005814.0de0d8ff@snowdrop.home> <436C8951.4010008@gentoo.org> <20051105111006.GA14844@kloeri> <436C9798.5020805@gentoo.org> <20051105114729.GB14844@kloeri> <436CAC58.4090809@gentoo.org> <1131309435.8543.16.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20051106214747.4e6a9cff@snowdrop.home> <1131382994.8546.34.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <436F9DC6.8040106@gentoo.org> <1131390151.7826.20.camel@Memoria.anyarch.net> <1131390881.7826.24.camel@Memoria.anyarch.net> <436FB4BB.3020205@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99-rc2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_20_21_55_+0000_ppRJmE/WuCnRFg/m"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 8f5fe317-f298-4aae-91aa-e630e4f171ef X-Archives-Hash: a4e10c2d23f8872ed11b33097df92a97 --Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_20_21_55_+0000_ppRJmE/WuCnRFg/m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 21:10:35 +0100 Grobian wrote: | It is a well-known fact that removing seemingly useless background | noise can cause relations between problems not to be recognised. | Some users know that and hence would like to see all errata. And, conveniently enough, the GLEP sticks all the news items (errata is a bad choice of word, since we don't have a single release against which we make corrections) in a single place. | Our GLSAs are sent out exactly in the same way, but there is not a | word on them in the GLEP, neither does anyone seem to care about | them, while they seem to me at least ***VERY*** important, that is, | much more important than a message about breaking my installation. Yes, because it's better to have a system which is immune to denial of service attacks from local users who all have physical access to the system than one which actually works. Riiiiight. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_20_21_55_+0000_ppRJmE/WuCnRFg/m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDb7dl96zL6DUtXhERAnhRAJ49hGTD2BH2MLv1dXUG+pW/yYjZqACeOE6z KaqWzeQcun4ZxNAvgTYqI7s= =fCUr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_20_21_55_+0000_ppRJmE/WuCnRFg/m-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list