From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EZD9N-0002ca-7A for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:59:29 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA7JvE3P012769; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:57:14 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA7Jq0xn021995 for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:52:00 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EZD27-0008PW-FA for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:51:59 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EZD21-0003Cc-DD for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 19:51:53 +0000 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:51:50 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two Message-ID: <20051107195150.2522d3b2@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <436FA6DB.1090509@gentoo.org> References: <20051105005814.0de0d8ff@snowdrop.home> <436C8951.4010008@gentoo.org> <20051105111006.GA14844@kloeri> <436C9798.5020805@gentoo.org> <20051105114729.GB14844@kloeri> <436CAC58.4090809@gentoo.org> <1131309435.8543.16.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <20051106214747.4e6a9cff@snowdrop.home> <1131382994.8546.34.camel@mogheiden.gnqs.org> <436F9DC6.8040106@gentoo.org> <20051107184153.0530a19a@snowdrop.home> <436FA6DB.1090509@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99-rc2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_19_51_50_+0000_QtjgmMVDQ9.iKz_i; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 72157f5d-ffb1-4676-92b7-3d2723552da4 X-Archives-Hash: 86a38dc6c44bbfde81c909d6a671666e --Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_19_51_50_+0000_QtjgmMVDQ9.iKz_i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:11:23 +0100 Grobian wrote: | Besides that, I see no arguments why users don't. No proof either. Have a look at how amazingly well certain recent upgrades have gone... | Forcing a push-based method on someone who likes pull-based methods | is evil. The least you can do to make everybody happy, is allow | pull-based access to the important news items, and devote some more | words on how to disable your 'feature'. Why does it need more words? It already has a sentence, and that's all that's needed. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_19_51_50_+0000_QtjgmMVDQ9.iKz_i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDb7BZ96zL6DUtXhERAmG0AJ48c60weAPEUAOXm9rcfTkJwCpZIwCeL0aR YScIiXlkpQsTOnDgQggMfBc= =lY/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Mon__7_Nov_2005_19_51_50_+0000_QtjgmMVDQ9.iKz_i-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list