From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EYXDu-0006eN-HF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:13:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA5NCJpf024989; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 23:12:19 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA5NAPnV026612 for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 23:10:25 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EYXB2-0001Ad-Us for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:10:25 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EYXAy-0000pr-6X for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 23:10:20 +0000 Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 23:10:17 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 42 "Critical News Reporting" Round Two Message-ID: <20051105231017.103025f8@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051105202931.GD25194@nightcrawler> References: <20051105005814.0de0d8ff@snowdrop.home> <20051105112451.GA24767@nightcrawler> <20051105174535.52f6187d@snowdrop.home> <20051105202931.GD25194@nightcrawler> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99-rc2 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Signature_Sat__5_Nov_2005_23_10_17_+0000_cFOtFy+QGwKWGXm6; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 89e3307a-300c-4506-bf19-1be3a57c7881 X-Archives-Hash: 5600b46e67206a2bd853740e480beee3 --Signature_Sat__5_Nov_2005_23_10_17_+0000_cFOtFy+QGwKWGXm6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 14:29:31 -0600 Brian Harring wrote: | > Signing elsewhere isn't mandatory yet. |=20 | Deal with it ;) In order to deal with it, I'd also have to come up with a solution to distributing keys for Gentoo developers. That's a separate issue which must be addressed separately. A wording change from "may" to "should be" is fine by me, but "must be" is not, at least until we have a real signing system in place. | > | Already pointed out that this won't fly looking forward, it | > | implicitly assumes a single repository. | >=20 | > Again, we can deal with that if Portage ever gets multiple repo | > support. Until it does, I'm not trying to guess how it's going to | > end up being implemented. |=20 | *cough* PORTDIR_OVERLAY *cough* |=20 | Already have multiple repo support. Assumed you meant standalone, in=20 | which case I still think you're dodging support that must be there. Overlays override on conflicts, they don't run in parallel. | Changing it after the fact because it wasn't design with an extra bit=20 | of forward thinking isn't something I'm incredibly game for. Yes | it's extra work for you, but you're proposing the change ;) |=20 | You're going for forward compatibility... this is just that. I'm going for not making any design decisions which will preclude reasonable future changes. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Anti-XML, anti-newbie conspiracy) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Sat__5_Nov_2005_23_10_17_+0000_cFOtFy+QGwKWGXm6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDbTvb96zL6DUtXhERAo8JAJ9deJlVOfyf+khD5b8I3YPJ5Glw3gCfRvcR tuabqeN9aHu0+rVo3CF+pRs= =5lba -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Sat__5_Nov_2005_23_10_17_+0000_cFOtFy+QGwKWGXm6-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list