From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EYUpe-0006yw-T9
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20:40:11 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA5KdTRJ024083;
	Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:39:29 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA5Kbg1Q009430
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:37:43 GMT
Received: from vapier by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EYUnG-0006Zn-Qd
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Nov 2005 20:37:42 +0000
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:37:42 +0000
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] useful profiles.desc
Message-ID: <20051105203742.GB11335@toucan.gentoo.org>
References: <436CC04C.5060401@gentoo.org> <1131215695.27346.25.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1131215695.27346.25.camel@vertigo.twi-31o2.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-Archives-Salt: c38a2d6b-96a6-4259-ae11-755830e9286d
X-Archives-Hash: a4628e1ee95ba795f7345048d0d61a71

On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 01:34:55PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 09:23 -0500, Aaron Walker wrote:
> > Continuing a subject I've brought up several times in the past...
> > 
> > Are we any closer to having a profiles.desc that lists all valid profiles?
> > IIRC the current stable portage should be ok with it.  Are there any other
> > issues preventing this from becoming a reality?
> 
> Also, what are the valid "status" entries?  Is it just dev and stable?

well, repoman only cares about "dev", but yes, those are the only two status 
values we are using atm
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list