From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EY5Qs-0008Tr-5i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 17:32:54 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA4HWCr7024566; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:32:12 GMT Received: from outbound3.mail.tds.net (outbound3.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.93]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA4HTwsP032643 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 17:29:58 GMT Received: from outaamta02.mail.tds.net (outaamta02.mail.tds.net [216.170.230.32]) by outbound3.mail.tds.net (8.13.4/8.12.2) with ESMTP id jA4HTvit011777 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:29:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from cerberus.oppresses.us ([69.21.248.131]) by outaamta02.mail.tds.net with ESMTP id <20051104172957.OAO15375.outaamta02.mail.tds.net@cerberus.oppresses.us> for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:29:57 -0600 Received: by cerberus.oppresses.us (Postfix, from userid 500) id D55544ABFB; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:29:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:29:49 -0500 From: Jon Portnoy To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Message-ID: <20051104172949.GA18114@cerberus.oppresses.us> References: <20051104004247.0ff50ff0@snowdrop.home> <436AB342.9040606@ieee.org> <20051104011106.780b46bb@snowdrop.home> <436AB84B.4010406@ieee.org> <20051104013132.27edcdc5@snowdrop.home> <436ABB03.3020902@ieee.org> <1131113099.18994.6.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <436B86B8.7000801@ieee.org> <1131122793.18994.42.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> <436B9587.7090704@ieee.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <436B9587.7090704@ieee.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Archives-Salt: a35048cd-4c20-4e99-a75a-46dcbc829141 X-Archives-Hash: 1f6f37fca1f98cc0fecad75d0d37b070 On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 12:08:23PM -0500, Nathan L. Adams wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Gianelloni wrote: > > > > Yeah, see, this is a case where not understanding the structure of > > Gentoo gives you the wrong impression. The GDP's policy applies to the > > GDP. That is not a global developer policy of any kind. It is a policy > > by a project, for that project. > > > > If I were, for example, to write up a nice guide for something on the > > games team and do it all in ASCII art, that policy has no bearing on > > what I do. If I were to write something for the GDP, then it would. > > > > At any rate, that has *zero* bearing on whether or not our update > > information needs to be written in GuideXML, so there's no point in > > arguing it with you. > > > > So you're saying that Gentoo consists of projects that are completely > 'silo'd up' and have no bearing whatsoever on each other. Then the > DevRel project only has bearing on those who actually join DevRel. Neat, > a group formed for the sole purpose of coordinating itself. Security > need only concern itself with securing its members (from who knows > what!), and infra can just ignore the needs of everyone else (different > project!). I wonder how any of the other projects *ever* made it onto > the website... No, he's saying you're talking out of your behind. And you continue to do so Gentoo projects have their own areas of responsibility, the GDP's area of responsibility is the GDP, devrel's area of responsibility is developers, infra's area of responsibility is infrastructure. Thank you, come again -- Jon Portnoy avenj/irc.freenode.net -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list