From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EX2ud-0002KY-BO for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 20:39:19 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA1KcaQ4026454; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:38:36 GMT Received: from kerberos.ynet.sk (proxy.ynet.sk [147.175.168.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA1KaZ9I000943 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 20:36:35 GMT Received: from kerberos.ynet.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kerberos.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088EBE343D for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.ynet.sk (marvin.ynet.sk [147.175.168.50]) by kerberos.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B33E33F8 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E580C242C1 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.ynet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (marvin.ynet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 01262-01-6 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from thelair.ynet.sk (thelair.ynet.sk [147.175.171.245]) by mail.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD45242BD for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from thelair.ynet.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thelair.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB10B512D for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 21:36:29 +0100 From: Andrej Kacian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Message-ID: <20051101213629.426e2e8d@thelair.ynet.sk> In-Reply-To: <20051101194417.GB20491@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> References: <20051101015125.1cc45eb4@snowdrop.home> <20051101145451.5f3c376d@thelair.ynet.sk> <20051101181855.12a5760f@snowdrop.home> <20051101202054.5e6c1b4f@thelair.ynet.sk> <20051101194417.GB20491@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> Organization: chaotic at best... X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.99 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_fMae96BazM8GwKsAOHjlJ/o"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ynet.sk X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Archives-Salt: 380fcba9-9155-446c-bb98-a92ed22f4ba7 X-Archives-Hash: 28fe7a9d79f5b7e3b61c030bfb6d3e2d --Sig_fMae96BazM8GwKsAOHjlJ/o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:44:17 -0600 Grant Goodyear wrote: > That seems a bit unfair to me. There's a complete logging facility in > portage CVS for a version that's probably not going to be released, but > I believe that the logging stuff is being back-ported to the current > version of portage. (Moreover, I would argue that this issue was never > ignored, but it often wasn't at the top of the list for what our limited > portage devs should be working on: see > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D11359#c83 .) It seems I was misinformed about this. My apologies to anyone working on th= is rather vital portage feature. --=20 Andrej "Ticho" Kacian Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86 --Sig_fMae96BazM8GwKsAOHjlJ/o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDZ9HNQlM6RnzZP+IRAk5dAJ97QFuG45UsxgTH3uoxBqfMCAgcbgCcDbjD wNNg/Ji6P0BudUWi1BQgA5A= =4XrS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_fMae96BazM8GwKsAOHjlJ/o-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list