From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EWzxN-0005BD-PY for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:29:58 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA1HTDHO022975; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:29:13 GMT Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.206]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA1HPvTk024881 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:25:57 GMT Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a4so335075nfc for ; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:25:56 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=ac9SJYTimskcmXyLhU87J2NYyH8D1HKkdoKQ4tGwdvMEmQVwM6ElZfMkMB/X3Ny7DBH8ktGlT92ELLDapHp27zGuVGrpOxgtngDr2goLBWilVpAlQpWwltVCREEgC0aSpe5NAu4bElhqKdXhK3Ik+j7ZIKgQGcEIfKKmJUfQK3g= Received: by 10.48.1.3 with SMTP id 3mr184088nfa; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org ( [151.56.93.66]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id l27sm936911nfa.2005.11.01.09.25.55; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:25:56 -0800 (PST) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] quixote currently unmaintained Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:25:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <20051031214102.GA22683@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <43669037.2070609@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43669037.2070609@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1764665.62FdvjSBBY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511011825.51756@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 90d02fe1-3447-4178-a8b6-28373425db8c X-Archives-Hash: 8cfd3e126caa21cf6af5fea1a3740941 --nextPart1764665.62FdvjSBBY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 31 October 2005 22:44, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Checked the bugzilla and the two open bugs seem to be version bumps. I > think the policy is not to remove working ebuilds from the tree although > they are not maintained by anyone. I follow Petteri's statement, I don't think we should remove a package just= =20 because it has noone maintaining it, and is just hanging below latest=20 versions, without other reasons, else we should remove a good 90% of what w= e=20 have in media-video and media-sound. It's different if things accumulates bug over bugs, like xmms was, or are=20 broken and unmaintained upstream. =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1764665.62FdvjSBBY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDZ6Ufe2h1+2mHVWMRAhP7AJ0ZN/Ozy6jRwgxt9sgCzg771Xq+cACgi9c+ dqIG2fX+VX7bQvoOUjDt9Wc= =D0wt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1764665.62FdvjSBBY-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list