From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EWzcg-0000HI-7J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:08:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA1H7K0s015007; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:07:20 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA1H4NHZ022815 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 17:04:23 GMT Received: from d070214.adsl.hansenet.de ([80.171.70.214] helo=iglu.bnet.local) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EWzYc-0007MM-FQ for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 17:04:22 +0000 From: Carsten Lohrke To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] quixote currently unmaintained Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 18:04:08 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20051031214102.GA22683@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> <43669037.2070609@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43669037.2070609@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1297976.sTzdsf0Rjh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200511011804.19446.carlo@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 4be785ea-c3ef-4bca-a3b2-7fc161f62513 X-Archives-Hash: ba4ede622afd54467442819615177d9b --nextPart1297976.sTzdsf0Rjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 31 October 2005 22:44, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > Checked the bugzilla and the two open bugs seem to be version bumps. I > think the policy is not to remove working ebuilds from the tree although > they are not maintained by anyone. It's not policy to keep unmaintained stuff in the repository either. I real= ly=20 welcome it, when someone takes the stance to clean out the tree a bit.=20 There's too much unmaintained or even broken stuff in it. I think Grant should go for it, unless you or someone else takes over=20 maintainership. Carsten --nextPart1297976.sTzdsf0Rjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1-ecc0.1.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDZ6ATVwbzmvGLSW8RAk4TAJ9ItNjlkp0ez+Ac/Q1g0eEuFtPlRQCfe9Wh vvIJuQ/E2Fpz7x9+wbSteT4= =1AbZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1297976.sTzdsf0Rjh-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list