From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EWvGS-00025S-4L for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:29:20 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA1CR2ig021946; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:27:02 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA1CLCA4006152 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:21:13 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EWv8a-0004si-9O for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:21:12 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EWv8Y-0006Cx-HO for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:21:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:21:08 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Message-ID: <20051101122108.56580e2a@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20051101015125.1cc45eb4@snowdrop.home> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_12_21_08_+0000_6ECRhET04/5+Wke."; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 4c38407b-bc81-4c1f-98e6-e6ac2fc7fc8c X-Archives-Hash: d2f5983ded63c0c008272896c4d9e68c --Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_12_21_08_+0000_6ECRhET04/5+Wke. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 02:21:31 -0700 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: | I'd suggest we preemptively incorporate an ENewsVersion or similar | field as well, to be 1.0, with this proposal, but should the format | ever need changed, that would allow for a format version 1.1 or 2.0 | or whatever. As the GLEP suggests that future GLEPs may add new | headers, this would allow them to update this version field as | necessary, presumably using the familiar minor version =3D backward | compatible, major version if not backward compatible, versioning | scheme. Sounds reasonable. | One other niggle. The encoding is specified as UTF-8, but then the | format is specified as RFC-822 (7-bit ASCII, pre-i18n) compatible. | I'm not up on i18n specs, but presumably there's a newer RFC that | specifies how internationalized internet messages are handled in an | RFC-822 backward compatible way? If so, it may make more sense to | reference that specific RFC, which presumably deals with UTF-8 | instead of specifying 7-bit ASCII as does 822. Alternatively, | MIME/Quoted-printable could be specified, which would allow for | escaped 8-bit chars, as I'd /assume/ UTF-8 requires, given the -8. | (I /said/ I'm not up on that!) Hrm. The "RFC-822 like" phrase is used in various places (for example, the GLEP specification) to describe the structure of the header section. I don't think it precludes us also specifying UTF-8. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_12_21_08_+0000_6ECRhET04/5+Wke. Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDZ12296zL6DUtXhERAs76AJ0dntJMV68e2M/Qb+OYigmiKSSKqgCgiB2b 7bhjENJYEQzyZlUvTEQxfG8= =KKlA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_12_21_08_+0000_6ECRhET04/5+Wke.-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list