From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EWuql-0002g8-B1 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:02:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id jA1C0VFj027221; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 12:00:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jA1Buf9a027442 for ; Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:56:41 GMT Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EWukq-0003ty-W6 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:56:41 +0000 Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home) by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1EWukp-00068t-19 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2005 11:56:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 11:56:36 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP ??: Critical News Reporting Message-ID: <20051101115636.7de6e00b@snowdrop.home> In-Reply-To: <20051101082533.GC18490@superlupo.rechner> References: <20051101015125.1cc45eb4@snowdrop.home> <20051101082533.GC18490@superlupo.rechner> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_11_56_36_+0000_UsU/lVrPyqHkyZ8R"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 X-Archives-Salt: 1c2f3d26-9d88-4245-a284-26d27ef4f563 X-Archives-Hash: d529392a3e94c7ff6d1d87bf700cd22d --Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_11_56_36_+0000_UsU/lVrPyqHkyZ8R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 09:25:34 +0100 Wernfried Haas wrote: | On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 01:51:25AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > There is currently no explanation as to why this GLEP should be | > chosen over ChrisWhite's 42. I will add such a section if anyone | > requests it. | Any reason why you chose bashing Chris' GLEP in another mail and start | your own instead of working together and bringing your input for 42? Yup. I already had most of my GLEP written, and I don't see anything in ChrisWhite's list of vagueness worth using. Besides, there's nothing wrong with multiple competing GLEPs on an issue. | I miss references to the old log ewarn issue, which really should be | solved as well while we're at it. Separate concern. | There are some good ideas in your GLEP, so are some in Chris'. No good | is coming from having two similar GLEPs around at the same | time. So please don't waste our time [1] by having two more or less | redundant GLEPs discussed. It's my view that ChrisWhite's GLEP is a complete waste of space, given that it doesn't contain an actual proposal. I see no point in using it. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron) Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm --Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_11_56_36_+0000_UsU/lVrPyqHkyZ8R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDZ1f296zL6DUtXhERAo5gAKDJmy8iJljrsU37rpvcgjwlyrA24QCeJoC8 shfIUZcsJuhDNp5dNTt+LjQ= =9FEK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature_Tue__1_Nov_2005_11_56_36_+0000_UsU/lVrPyqHkyZ8R-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list