From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EUUKo-0005X8-4a
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:19:46 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9PJJ1xD032460;
	Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:19:01 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9PJG6TM013024
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:16:07 GMT
Received: from 82-41-57-20.cable.ubr08.edin.blueyonder.co.uk ([82.41.57.20] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EUUHG-0007Gr-Jl
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 19:16:06 +0000
Received: from localhost.home ([127.0.0.1] helo=snowdrop.home)
	by snowdrop.home with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EUUHE-0003iU-Qy
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:16:04 +0100
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:16:02 +0100
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder on dependencies.
Message-ID: <20051025201602.6d0bf6eb@snowdrop.home>
In-Reply-To: <1130262936.8910.63.camel@alto>
References: <1130199485.1413.3.camel@Darkmere.darkmere>
	<435DB66F.9060807@gentoo.org>
	<20051025131519.29788e3d@snowdrop.home>
	<435E3C7F.6060308@gentoo.org>
	<20051025173956.0348f310@snowdrop.home>
	<1130262936.8910.63.camel@alto>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
 boundary=Signature_Tue__25_Oct_2005_20_16_02_+0100_8wg5xEf9KGHkKrOJ;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1
X-Archives-Salt: 63eb0c26-9d91-48b6-9257-e29bc6fb7dc9
X-Archives-Hash: 87c2dc946aa87557e6893e8bce22283d

--Signature_Tue__25_Oct_2005_20_16_02_+0100_8wg5xEf9KGHkKrOJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 13:55:36 -0400 solar <solar@gentoo.org> wrote:
| Please do not put words in my mouth. I've already asserted to you
| several times that the definition of RDEPEND=3D is unclear and that we
| do infact need a new set of depend atoms. R=3D(runtime) not Buildtime
| for the NNth time. Till then please focus your efforts on something
| useful that does not break other peoples systems or projects.

Given the choice of possibly causing minor inconvenience to the embedded
people or outright breaking the tree for every single user, the sane
option is to keep the tree working. If embedded has a requirement for
better DEPEND specifications, why don't they start working on a GLEP?

--=20
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


--Signature_Tue__25_Oct_2005_20_16_02_+0100_8wg5xEf9KGHkKrOJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDXoR096zL6DUtXhERArJxAJ9JGHw+vaQ7lh4efuk7pT50BU8nzgCfSa4g
MvTXMJY61sBy1+0KmcW9MQQ=
=Om0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Signature_Tue__25_Oct_2005_20_16_02_+0100_8wg5xEf9KGHkKrOJ--
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list