From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1ETBKY-0003hD-EQ
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:50:06 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9M4l52W019147;
	Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:47:05 GMT
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9M4jMrV028876
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:45:22 GMT
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org)
	by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETBIj-0003tx-GT
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 04:48:13 +0000
Received: (qmail 11026 invoked from network); 22 Oct 2005 00:46:32 -0400
Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2)
  by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 22 Oct 2005 00:46:32 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Organization: wh0rd.org
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] rm `which gcc` && emerge -e world
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 00:48:16 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <1129950753.4942.15.camel@TSUNAMI.MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <1129950753.4942.15.camel@TSUNAMI.MIT.EDU>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510220048.16429.vapier@gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: bc28823e-1104-44a0-98b3-cb5b8d9d1a9a
X-Archives-Hash: 9da61e7a6e6455880b1598cc1a09b572

On Friday 21 October 2005 11:12 pm, Tomasz Mloduchowski wrote:
> I got sick of filling 3 almost identical bug reports

please stop doing this

we are already playing with doing this in the wrapper itself so that 
compilation is transparent

i'd wager to say the majority of packages in portage run `gcc` and `g++` 
rather than ${CTARGET}-gcc
-mike
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list