From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ET0fP-0001mL-C0 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:26:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9LHNQtw028039; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:23:26 GMT Received: from basillia.speedxs.net (basillia.speedxs.net [83.98.255.13]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9LHLCIw026643 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:21:12 GMT Received: from debruijne.speedxs.nl (debruijne.speedxs.nl [83.98.237.219]) by basillia.speedxs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46267330 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:11:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Michiel de Bruijne To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:23:53 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <43581061.5090102@gentoo.org> <46059ce10510201949p6957801dm4beee21e9fb5f401@mail.gmail.com> <200510202256.57881.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200510202256.57881.vapier@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510211923.54100.m.debruijne@hccnet.nl> X-Archives-Salt: a3bc4858-49fb-4907-9e75-db3ebe391610 X-Archives-Hash: 6a1a91299490243ff6e7d7b94b789447 On Friday 21 October 2005 04:56, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 20 October 2005 10:49 pm, Dan Meltzer wrote: > > Why single out this one? ones system will not break irreperbly > > without a cxx compiler, it'll just cause a another recompile to get it > > to work after breakage if the person is using -* (which has already > > been said to be hackish and ill-advised, so doom on them! > > it will actually > > if you build gcc w/out C++ support that means no libstdc++ > > no libstdc++ means python on most boxes is now broken > > no python means no emerge > > how exactly are you going to re-emerge gcc then ? oh, you cant ... > -mike Can you think of a situation where this is desired? If not, why not remove the cxx IUSE and always build the C++-component? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list