From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ET9LX-00021H-5J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:42:59 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9M2dVJ2016487; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:39:31 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9M2bV6Z005246 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:37:31 GMT Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=home.wh0rd.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ET9Iz-00025s-HO for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 02:40:21 +0000 Received: (qmail 17363 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2005 09:11:59 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO vapier) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Oct 2005 09:11:59 -0400 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:13:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43581061.5090102@gentoo.org> <4358BB36.1090902@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4358BB36.1090902@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200510210913.29341.vapier@gentoo.org> X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by robin.gentoo.org id j9M2bV6Z005246 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by robin.gentoo.org id j9M2dVKc016487 X-Archives-Salt: 751592af-5973-4377-85b8-3533395c0281 X-Archives-Hash: 586e26a999495483d462d887b5bbe1d7 On Friday 21 October 2005 05:56 am, Marius Mauch wrote: > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > > Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use fla= gs. > > Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask > > file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags= by > > default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every loc= al > > use flag. > > The main problem I'd have with this is the stacking order, e.g. > profiles/package.use has "app-misc/foo bar" and make.conf has > "USE=3D-bar", which one should be preferred? this is a no brainer profile use.defaults profile package.use profile make.defaults user make.conf user package.use user env -mike --=20 gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list