From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESiUd-0006Ov-UJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 22:02:36 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KLxWnt003269; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:59:32 GMT Received: from sa12.bezeqint.net (sa12.bezeqint.net [192.115.104.27]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KLvhbm012064 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:57:43 GMT Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by sa12.bezeqint.net (Bezeq International SMTP out Mail Server) with ESMTP id 2E23634A2E for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:56:33 +0200 (IST) Received: from sa12.bezeqint.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sa12 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04881-07 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:56:26 +0200 (IST) Received: from alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (unknown [81.218.66.40]) by sa12.bezeqint.net (Bezeq International SMTP out Mail Server) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 23:56:26 +0200 (IST) Received: by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 1011) id A718F1883D8; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:23:21 +0200 (GMT-2) Received: from beta.danarmak.homelinux.net (beta.danarmak.homelinux.net [10.0.3.86]) by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3BF1883D2 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:23:16 +0200 (GMT-2) From: Dan Armak Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ${PORTDIR}/profiles/package.use Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:04 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <43581061.5090102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <43581061.5090102@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3962632.OsVB5A6I1M"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510210000.04554.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bezeqint.net X-Archives-Salt: b74ecdb0-26b4-4348-98c7-781a53af05a9 X-Archives-Hash: a2c5ecd67d1383dbcbb37a509b115ac7 --nextPart3962632.OsVB5A6I1M Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 20 October 2005 23:47, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > Every once in a while I see people wanting to use nosomething use flags. > Why don't we have a package.use like we already have a package.mask > file? This would make it possible for developers to turn on use flags by > default in a way that would not cruft the base profiles for every local > use flag. Because implementing https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61732 would = be a=20 lot more cool :-) Besides, if the effect on portage's behavior is the same, what's the=20 difference? =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart3962632.OsVB5A6I1M Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDWBNkUI2RQ41fiVERAmfWAJ9KFnrS9U8fM9DHur3VUXhLSMdZIwCcDl3l OjIuSDWUa99gHny/81f3Ziw= =Sihx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3962632.OsVB5A6I1M-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list