From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESgEU-0000NB-Oe for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:37:47 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KJZ1Re018725; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:35:01 GMT Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KJXGOj026623 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:33:17 GMT Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so181547wri for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:35:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=HRQMUXiHIg1MtiOq+2LEXPSpcgWaV7zgjC+Jlb43rDRSkDegjPkrdta7/W9KKYmXADY/lVE6385rETxa8s/dPkPNFK81utJ5l2m5sSPG6szcVSpk6ri7mIXBYEK2hMeWmmwtIz9ptlRkYBG+rECa/lpZfs868OWN958+e160l/U= Received: by 10.54.110.17 with SMTP id i17mr1001698wrc; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [151.44.23.29]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 28sm9771854wrl.2005.10.20.12.35.51; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:35:52 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?q?Petten=C3=B2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:35:39 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <4357432E.2020009@gentoo.org> <4357E549.4000105@gentoo.org> <200510202125.08983.danarmak@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <200510202125.08983.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1787313.LgtqWGSVpJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510202135.48692@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: ab5d724f-ec6d-47b2-941c-786810399f28 X-Archives-Hash: 703c60ea64f24bf0430fd331bf6f0a2a --nextPart1787313.LgtqWGSVpJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 20 October 2005 21:25, Dan Armak wrote: > True. I forget - why can't we solve the problem of all nofoo USE flags th= is > way? Or is the (remaining) problem only with local flags? Too many people using -* (due to auto flags) so that will break for most of= =20 them. It's one of the reasons we have nocxx for example (you see how many people= =20 would break with -cxx on useflags? :P). =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=C3=B2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1787313.LgtqWGSVpJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDV/GUe2h1+2mHVWMRAsjNAKDkLNPxPT8Uif4PI5KsKUCrtOhsdwCbBpZB A94bcSbLbolRwTnUvsvGJcU= =q3Yi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1787313.LgtqWGSVpJ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list