From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ESg6C-0002X4-RF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:29:13 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9KJPTTI010345; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:25:29 GMT Received: from sa3.bezeqint.net (sa3.bezeqint.net [192.115.104.17]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9KJMu8L015873 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 19:22:56 GMT Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by sa3.bezeqint.net (Bezeq International SMTP out Mail Server) with ESMTP id D2BE834074 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:25:31 +0200 (IST) Received: from sa3.bezeqint.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sa3 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24468-02 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:25:28 +0200 (IST) Received: from alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (unknown [81.218.66.40]) by sa3.bezeqint.net (Bezeq International SMTP out Mail Server) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:25:28 +0200 (IST) Received: by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 2E1F6188363; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:48:19 +0200 (GMT-2) Received: from beta.danarmak.homelinux.net (beta.danarmak.homelinux.net [10.0.3.86]) by alpha.danarmak.homelinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F061A188360 for ; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:48:04 +0200 (GMT-2) From: Dan Armak Organization: Gentoo Technologies, Inc. To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] modular X - 7.0 RC1 Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 21:25:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.92 References: <4357432E.2020009@gentoo.org> <200510201754.53322.danarmak@gentoo.org> <4357E549.4000105@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4357E549.4000105@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1224017.zqpJR5kLiN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510202125.08983.danarmak@gentoo.org> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bezeqint.net X-Archives-Salt: 8ee19d47-36eb-437a-9ea7-465bfd476a9e X-Archives-Hash: d388c3bc2359fb35eb7fc7e4fd7440b4 --nextPart1224017.zqpJR5kLiN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 20 October 2005 20:43, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > - gpg control packet > > Dan Armak wrote: > | On Thursday 20 October 2005 17:28, Luca Barbato wrote: > |>a useflag could solve the issue as well a all inclusive metaebuild for = X. > | > | To solve this issue it would have to be an on-by-default flag, i.e. > | 'noxserver'. I know some people are strongly against nofoo flags. > > Or, you could just activate it in the base profile. True. I forget - why can't we solve the problem of all nofoo USE flags this= =20 way? Or is the (remaining) problem only with local flags? =2D-=20 Dan Armak Gentoo Linux developer (KDE) Public GPG key: http://dev.gentoo.org/~danarmak/danarmak-gpg-public.key =46ingerprint: DD70 DBF9 E3D4 6CB9 2FDD 0069 508D 9143 8D5F 8951 --nextPart1224017.zqpJR5kLiN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDV+8UUI2RQ41fiVERAvZnAJ94DBN38TvaMIplbXD+BDY/9rPsrACdEm6C 3b/sH/mm0guJDzh39mYuHao= =Ug3A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1224017.zqpJR5kLiN-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list