From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ERwVK-0002QR-M5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:48:07 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9IIjcAX012195; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:45:38 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9IIhs2X020769 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:43:55 GMT Received: from agriffis by smtp.gentoo.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ERwTR-0004cG-A9 for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 18:46:09 +0000 Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 14:44:17 -0400 X-OfflineIMAP-2140949095-64676f73656e64-494e424f582e4f7574626f78: 1129661170-0398940831666-v4.0.11 From: Aron Griffis To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin Message-ID: <20051018184417.GC14753@vino.zko.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20051017185013.GE20137@vino.zko.hp.com> <20051018144615.GA9150@ytpme.telenet.be> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051018144615.GA9150@ytpme.telenet.be> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: b1a3a75b-830a-49a4-b08e-a8890fe134ab X-Archives-Hash: 501b12e65176f47226569e6731f7cc93 --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Thomas Matthijs wrote: [Tue Oct 18 2005, 10:46:15AM EDT] > We had discussed it prior and then nobody seemed to object to > browserplugin, only after we changed it. Actually that's not true. http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02898.html You see that karltk said he would be making the change to browserplugin "over the course of the next few days". Diego responded in the same day regarding nsplugins. I sent a message that day and the following day, but there was no response from karltk or the java team. http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02896.html http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02911.html http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg02925.html > You have the java herd's blessing to go ahead and change it. > Please announce it to gentoo-java@ aswell when you make the change. Will do, thanks. Regards, Aron -- Aron Griffis Gentoo Linux Developer --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDVUKBJrHF4yAQTrARAj2RAJ4s2esJWYlYv4u7DrQ2opEuSdrTlACdEAvN EpihGqF/uxfi0GBcoDa2xeE= =AxM3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list