From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EQNLf-00072v-W7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:03:40 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9EB1nt1022971; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:01:49 GMT Received: from qproxy.gmail.com (qproxy.gmail.com [72.14.204.206]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9EB05k7005528 for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:00:06 GMT Received: by qproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id p32so291837qba for ; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 04:01:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:sender; b=dit9ZxaDexHb7tbedsDofy4UHB/gVIGFIcRGt0aNkZYal7N6kCR6bfEsF88qN3biEB7PqesfftHj9ynL3ln+B3STRzGEk8TUKf4P5idlzmEdj3Hy6YKNB7A1it4wxHD+q0OjrJJ3yWBnY6JnVnDEzEgWcBuc8ikqkIMdGK22O88= Received: by 10.65.236.16 with SMTP id n16mr1091589qbr; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:42:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.2? ( [151.56.63.142]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id d2sm5131993qbc.2005.10.14.01.42.04; Fri, 14 Oct 2005 01:42:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' =?iso-8859-1?q?Petten=F2?=" To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Handling compatible multi tools Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:41:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.91 References: <200510140034.18238@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> <434F6996.8070706@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <434F6996.8070706@gentoo.org> X-Face: +=-v@W}H`=.Bn2t&97Un7{[.c0aP0"8)JI?7Z?E>l>ZNY|,=?utf-8?q?mL=5C3bs=0A=09xW=23jRz=7CVa=5C?=@NIS3-'W[F.^YLqK=rS:D*Ke`Y5giI@$(xIBQ<0i740;wuI{lYd>>=?utf-8?q?eFVDuAr=0A=09=3Br=5B*=7E/zd=604dEI?= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1950312.hNqClblmOB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200510141042.05620@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> Sender: "=?UTF-8?Q?Diego=20\"Flameeyes\"=20Petten=C3=B2?=" X-Archives-Salt: 523ff61b-7c97-42c4-8e0d-feef2dcacfbd X-Archives-Hash: 299f53a5b133a98490fdbcd0b6161194 --nextPart1950312.hNqClblmOB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 14 October 2005 10:17, Simon Stelling wrote: > What would we gain with such a change? You have two tools installed that > are nearly equal, so why would one want to have two of them? Testing, for once. How many people have both vim and nano installed? Or xine and mplayer? I don't see much difference from this to having two tar.... =2D-=20 Diego "Flameeyes" Petten=F2 - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/ Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE --nextPart1950312.hNqClblmOB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDT29de2h1+2mHVWMRAvIVAJ9LOlgj2zQrFPvggat1K7DCK4huBQCeK/xf oMbuazaL/eH4JOMWWBTaB10= =Npqw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1950312.hNqClblmOB-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list