From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EP3od-0001uF-LS
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:00:08 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9AJoIsG007783;
	Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:50:18 GMT
Received: from corwin.easynet.fr (smarthost162.mail.easynet.fr [212.180.1.162])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9AJlVU5003395
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 19:47:31 GMT
Received: from easyconnect2121138-64.clients.easynet.fr ([212.11.38.64] helo=eusebe)
	by corwin.easynet.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EP3lV-0001b0-PV
	for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:56:53 +0200
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:56:02 +0200
From: Thomas de Grenier de Latour <degrenier@easyconnect.fr>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: Improved ebuild information
Message-ID: <20051010215602.61d3685f@eusebe>
In-Reply-To: <dief3j$scs$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <433EEF5B.1040102@stiefelweb.de>
	<20051001212202.3e7537f3@snowdrop.home>
	<1128535434.7199.6.camel@lycan.lan>
	<di6voo$s4d$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<1128948829.8881.52.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net>
	<dief3j$scs$1@sea.gmane.org>
Organization: Fasmz
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.14 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 17897941-dbf2-44a6-8f38-6f8d7ffe7a05
X-Archives-Hash: f3dc51261db1971855acbba2b2703cb1

On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:23:29 -0600
R Hill <dirtyepic.sk@gmail.com> wrote:

>  what other than equery would need to be fixed to recognize
> the overlay?  is there anything that would explicitly break if a
> USE flag was in both use.desc and use.local.desc?
> 

Last time this feature was discussed here, i've implemented it, and
in addition to equery i've also touched emerge (new options to
display some flag descriptions) and repoman (no behavioral change
iirc, just some refactoring). It was bug #84884.

--
TGL.
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list