From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EP5EA-000587-Fg for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:30:34 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j9ALKiZN026324; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:20:44 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j9ALHsFX018330 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:17:54 GMT Received: from bmb24.med.uth.tmc.edu ([129.106.207.24] helo=localhost) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EP5Ay-0006XC-Uq for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2005 21:27:17 +0000 Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 16:27:14 -0500 From: Grant Goodyear To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Council meeting Thursday October 13th Message-ID: <20051010212714.GL31219@bmb24.uth.tmc.edu> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <434A5FA9.206@gentoo.org> <1128949257.8881.54.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1128949257.8881.54.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: 839a718a-8f4f-4ad2-be86-d0fff5982ffc X-Archives-Hash: 87e9afab576841e7e788b2393aec59ff --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chris Gianelloni wrote: [Mon Oct 10 2005, 08:00:57AM CDT] > I'd like to see the council fight it out over^W^W^W^Wdiscuss which > logger should be the default. Gads, what a horrible idea (in my opinion, anyway). Surely we can come to some sort of decision on this issue without involving the council? My suggestion: leave it up to base-system to choose a default, and if it differs from what's in the docs then it would be nice if they'd let the docs folks know. -g2boojum- --=20 Grant Goodyear=09 Gentoo Developer g2boojum@gentoo.org http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76 --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDStyyptxxUuD2W3YRAiEqAJ9J6f5qUpiNOfLDYa4rJrYDl3aiUwCeMrNQ FDIGJKlAR/aFDmiK5Selr1o= =shdl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list