From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RKiz7-000656-SF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:56:30 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A07521C035 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:56:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tiger.gg3.net (m006052.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [219.121.6.52]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j93E7YkL031264 for ; Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:07:35 GMT Received: (qmail 12485 invoked by uid 89); 3 Oct 2005 14:15:37 -0000 Received: from lion.gg3.net (HELO lion) (10.0.0.2) by 0 with SMTP; 3 Oct 2005 14:15:37 -0000 Received: by lion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 From: Georgi Georgiev To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Interactive emerge Message-ID: <20051003141536.GA8173@lion.gg3.net> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <46059ce10510021021w2bb16de5u3d22ed86bb4ac85b@mail.gmail.com> <1128344218.6692.14.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1128344218.6692.14.camel@cgianelloni.nuvox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archives-Salt: dbdaab7a-bada-4d81-b3b8-1c5e805a062b X-Archives-Hash: b0bcd2e44a941c94c7b2ee9339fa1d60 --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline maillog: 03/10/2005-08:56:57(-0400): Chris Gianelloni types > On Sun, 2005-10-02 at 13:21 -0400, Dan Meltzer wrote: > > Hi, I would just like some clarification if at all possible. > > > > Recently, while testing bugzilla-2.18.4 for x86 (bug # 107796) I ran > > into some interactivity. I was under the impression that emerge was > > supposed to be completely autonomous, and any user interaction should > > take place in ebuild ... config. > > > > Apparantly one of us is {in,}correct, but I cannot find any > > documentation although I'm fairly sure I have read it.. > > Ebuilds *should* be non-interactive. There are a few exceptions to > this, such as ones triggered by USE flags (ala webapp-config.eclass) and > ones triggered by necessity (ala games from CD). Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was use-flag based RESTRICT... -- () Georgi Georgiev () Harrison's Postulate: For every action, () () chutz@gg3.net () there is an equal and opposite criticism. () () +81(90)2877-8845 () () --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDQT0IfXO2NUT1EmYRAlAwAKDbJ8kxDdauYXCJozr1GvlcOpOCiQCg9B+D RdRiaju+g+hawHIiWNuHJgY= =/Vrt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ-- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list