[gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED on 20050928

[gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED on 20050928

[Ciaran McCreesh]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3030 bytes --]

This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as
REVIEWED.  Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see
if there are any packages which your herd would like.

The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds which have been checked for basic
syntax and style issues. It does NOT mean that the ebuild actually works
(although it might), merely that you probably won't have to spend too
long fixing basic stuff.

This list is automagically generated. It will be sent to the gentoo-dev
mailing list at irregular intervals until someone asks me to stop.

  7210: app-text/html2ps (New package)
 42572: kde-misc/kxdocker ebuild - 
 57614: kde-?/kionjb (new package)
 74713: app-text/pdx-1.6.1 (new package)
 74928: media-sound/shn2make-2.11 (new package)
 81172: media-sound/mp3report (new package)
 81622: app-misc/fileschanged-0.6.1 (new package)
 81641: app-misc/cfilesplit-0.2 (new package)
 88638: dev-libs/sparsehash-0.1 (new package)
 93711: media-video/avi2mpeg-1.0 (new package)
 94078: sys-fs/smb-fuse-0.7.0 ebuild request
 96793: media-gfx/gimp-stitch-0.9.6 (New Package)
 96981: app-arch/XArchive (new ebuild)
 97677: istanbul - a desktop video screen capture recorder for the Free
Desktop
 98146: app-admin/sqlat-1.1.0 (New Package)
 99009: media-sound/cowbell (new package)
 99248: kde-?/kps-0.2.ebuild (New Package)
 99999: app-emulation/faumachine-20050720.ebuild (new package)
100043: app-admin/DenyHosts-0.9.0.ebuild (New Package)
100170: new ebuild: media-sound/lmms
100985: app-crypt/mypasswordsafe-20050615.ebuild (New Package)
101523: New ebuild: sys-apps/rrdcollect
101541: x11-plugins/gkfreq - gkrellm plugin (new ebuild).
102187: app-text/unicode-0.4.8.ebuild (New Package)
102323: sci-geosciences/gerris-0.6.0.ebuild (new package)
102449: app-misc/megatunix-0.7.9.ebuild (New Package)
102928: ebuild for media-sound/lltag
102931: Ebuild for media-gfx/llgal
102996: net-libs/gloox-0.6.1 (new package)
103436: net-?/nnfc-0.8.1.ebuild (New Package)
104011: net-misc/ncp (new package)
104018: net-ftp/cmdftp (new package)
104024: net-misc/nat-traverse (new package)
104027: app-crypt/tthsum (new package)
104219: app-office/jgnash-1.9.2.ebuild (New Package)
104628: media-?/japa ebuild
105096: media-?/wasp-0.1.3.ebuild (New Package)
105137: net-libs/libntlm-0.3.7.ebuild (New Package)
105171: net-zope/plone2pdf-0.3.4.ebuild (New Package)
105175: ebuild: rss2email
105191: media-?/fig2ps (new package)
105227: net-zope/Kupu 1.3 (new ebuild)
105253: dev-db/pxlib
105438: earth3d-1.0.3.ebuild (New Package)
105482: sci-?/basemap-0.6.2 (new ebuild)
105671: media-sound/mpck-0.10.ebuild (New Package)
105775: media-tv/klear-0.4.1 (new ebuild)
105814: sys-apps/lcdtest-1.0.1 (new package)
107329: app-shells/shish (new package)

This is a total of 49 bugs.



-- 
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Shell tools, Fluxbox, Cron)
Mail            : ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web             : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

shish/dietlibc WAS: Re: [gentoo-dev] maintainer-wanted ebuilds which are tagged REVIEWED on 20050928

[Benedikt Boehm]

On Wednesday 28 September 2005 20:23, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> This is a summary of maintainer-wanted packages which are tagged as
> REVIEWED.  Please take a few moments to glance over this list and see
> if there are any packages which your herd would like.
>
> The REVIEWED tag is used for ebuilds which have been checked for basic
> syntax and style issues. It does NOT mean that the ebuild actually works
> (although it might), merely that you probably won't have to spend too
> long fixing basic stuff.
>
> This list is automagically generated. It will be sent to the gentoo-dev
> mailing list at irregular intervals until someone asks me to stop.
>
> 107329: app-shells/shish (new package)

The vserver herd would take this, and we wonder if dietlibc has any maintainer 
at all (metadata says no) so we would take it as well, if nobody objects...

Bene
-- 
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list