From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EKEew-0002A1-CF for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:34:10 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with SMTP id j8RCQTWQ019498; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:26:29 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id j8RCOj1u025355 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:24:45 GMT Received: from zh034158.ppp.dion.ne.jp ([222.3.34.158] helo=opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.43) id 1EKEcb-0005hR-Uo for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 12:31:46 +0000 Received: by opteron246.suzuki-stubbs.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 62EC7248D4A; Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:31:57 +0900 (JST) From: Jason Stubbs To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dirt: To shove under the rug or not shove under the rug? (aka another round of USE_EXPAND) Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:31:57 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.91 References: <200509271823.25788.jstubbs@gentoo.org> <20050927125449.4f6017f2@eusebe> In-Reply-To: <20050927125449.4f6017f2@eusebe> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200509272131.57222.jstubbs@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 07f48a92-0d11-4e7a-a2cc-fbe7f718f8df X-Archives-Hash: 9912808be956cd2ac75a5c1a5761381c On Tuesday 27 September 2005 19:54, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:23:25 +0900 > > Jason Stubbs wrote: > > Bug 23826: Give more visibility to ebuilds variables (ALSA_CARDS, > > etc.) > > So i don't think this bug is really relevant in this discussion. > It has more to do with the idea (which was in the air at some > point iirc) of whitelisting vars that should be allowed to enter the > ebuild environment, and the possibility for ebuilds to declare some > addition to the standard whitelist. Maybe not exactly about USE_EXPAND but it hits directly on the point of the QA check that many are asking be removed. -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list