From: "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <flameeyes@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Dirt: To shove under the rug or not shove under the rug? (aka another round of USE_EXPAND)
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:44:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200509271544.17173@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509272151.17297.jstubbs@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 899 bytes --]
On Tuesday 27 September 2005 14:51, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> Variables are _not_ fine. I would think it should be clear to everybody by
> now that ebuilds can not pick random things from the computer they are
> installing on to define how they will build.
If variables are not fine, so can't be find thigns like profile arch, isn't
it? But that was a solution chosen for the merge of x86 and amd64...
And the same goes with quite everything defined on profile level, like the
others.
I still think that to users it shouldn't give a damn about ELIBC, USERLAND and
KERNEL, as they can just be mislead by thinking that they can change anything
about that..
How we can test for and condition dependencies with special profiles others
than this way?
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-27 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-27 9:23 [gentoo-dev] Dirt: To shove under the rug or not shove under the rug? (aka another round of USE_EXPAND) Jason Stubbs
2005-09-27 9:38 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-09-27 10:12 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-27 10:41 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
2005-09-27 12:51 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-27 13:44 ` Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò [this message]
2005-09-27 14:07 ` Kito
2005-09-27 16:27 ` Stephen Bennett
2005-09-27 16:48 ` Brian Harring
2005-09-27 14:25 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-27 15:40 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2005-09-27 12:38 ` [gentoo-dev] " Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-27 15:36 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-09-27 10:54 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2005-09-27 12:31 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-27 12:35 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-27 13:07 ` Thomas de Grenier de Latour
2005-09-27 13:50 ` Chris Gianelloni
2005-09-27 14:20 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-27 15:35 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-09-28 1:23 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-28 3:13 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-28 3:58 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-28 4:19 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-09-28 4:45 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-28 6:23 ` Donnie Berkholz
2005-09-28 8:03 ` Jason Stubbs
2005-09-28 4:21 ` Jason Stubbs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200509271544.17173@enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org \
--to=flameeyes@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox